I suppose that the classic way to demonstrate this is the age old question of 'what is blue?' When you and I look up at a clear sky I would say the sky is blue, and you would agree. (My conversations are not usually this dull, I swear.) But what is 'blue'? Well... it's...a colour that is....blue. Damn.
I personally became aware of this difference in perspective with Cynic. I have always been aware that I am what you would call a 'visual thinker'. I remember the names of shops by recalling what their shopfront looked like, I remember words on a flashcard by how the handwriting appeared and trace the letters of a word with my finger to work out how to spell them. I was explaining to Cynic that I knew what his lounge room looked like because I could picture it. But, he pointed out, what did I mean by 'picture it'?
Basically, what I'm trying to get across is that I don't believe there is any sure way of knowing that my perception of the world is the same, or even similar, to yours. Furthermore, I believe that if there is a discrepancy between how you and I think, then this is often a major source for conflict. If we are not able to convey how differently we perceive a certain topic or situation, then there cannot be scope for understanding, only tolerance at the very best, and hence no chance of acceptance and respect of a differing view.
To finish, I'd just like to point out the fun of being a visual thinker, in that I often 'see' words in my head, but not always as they are intended...
You say, "beer can", i see a rastafarian rasher of bacon.
You say "Amanda", but I see...
You say "a lawn", I see a lonely scotsman.
And how could we forget the craziness of the American Bill of Rights?
Sorry if this post didn't make much sense, but I guess that just proves my point, right?
Until next time,
be nice to your mother.